TESTS and STUDIES

TESTIMONIALS

ORDER

HOME

When comparing Skin Durx to other barrier cream products we have found the following differences:

Our formula contains no alcohol and two extra surfactants (Allontoin and Nonoxynol-9) Allantoin is used as a healing agent Nonoxynol-9 is used as anti-microbial agent.

  1. We only use food grade or pharmaceutical grade ingredients.
  2. We follow all FDA standards and monographs, we are a registered laboratory.
  3. We have had extensive testing done in six different independent labs. (results available upon request)
  4. Longevity. The original formula has been in existence since 1988 and we have continually enhanced and updated the product.

Skin Durx was first introduced in 1989 under several brand names as a skin shield product. The original product formulation was enhanced and tested from 1988-1999.  Skin Durx is now the most effective premium skin shield product on the market today.

TESTS-STUDIES CONDUCTED

1.  Galbraith Labs, August 1992 - Testing was done that shows resistance to strong acids and demonstrates how the skin shield product maintains its PH balance when exposed to these harsh chemicals.

2.  Nelson Laboratories, August 1992 - A wipe off test was done that proved that even after 10 hand washings with soap and water, the product was still in place and would provide an effective barrier to strong acids, solvents and other caustic or harmful substances.

3.  Amrep Laboratories, March 1993 - A more extensive test was done that showed that the skin shield product would protect from most strong chemicals and acids.

4.  University of Georgia, June 1993 - A test was performed showing that the skin shield has properties that will inactivate the e-coli viruses. An additional wipe off test was performed as well.

5.  Applied Consumer Services, September 1993 - This test was performed to show the efficiency of the skin shield product in preventing the penetration of common laboratory and industrial materials.

6.  Lab/Cor Inc.,September 1993 - These tests document applications per ounce as well as consistence of PH levels and Pore size relevance. There was also an additional test regarding a barrier to strong acids.

7.  Department of Health and Welfare Idaho, November 1993 - This testing was to prove that the skin shield product is manufactured in and remains a sterile product.

8.  Nelson Laboratories, August 1994 - The product was tested for organism growth and it performed well showing no negative growth.

9.  Nelson Laboratories, January 1998 -Testing proving that the skin shield product was effective against Staphylococcus aureus.

10.  Amrep, January 1999 -Certificate of Conformance

11.  Eugene Schaffstall, March 1999 - Confirming Testing Procedures.